Legal Opinion

FMC Corporation v. Burns

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1969No. 14758PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

This is a products liability case. Hugh Rouw, now deceased, and Winfred Burns, plaintiffs below, sued F.M.C. Corporation, defendant below, for damages allegedly resulting from the use of a wax product manufactured by defendant, in the processing of cucumbers from a farm operated by plaintiffs. Trial was to a jury who found that: defendant furnished to plaintiffs a waxing machine and wax product for use in the processing of cucumbers; the wax product so furnished was not reasonably fit for said use; plaintiffs’ cucumbers were damaged as a result of using defendant’s wax…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pittsburg v. PonderTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Dow Chemical Company v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texsun Feed Yards, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Ralston Purina Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Two Rivers Company v. Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture Inc., Defendant- Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Wells v. HCA Health Services of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Sun Exploration & Production Co. v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. FMC Corporation v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API