Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Company v. Benton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1962No. A-8791PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, JUSTICE.

The question here is whether an attorney may prosecute a cause of action on his own behalf to secure a contingent fee after his client, the original plaintiff, has been properly dismissed from the case. The trial court held that he could not. The Court of Civil Appeals disagreed and held that he could. 351 S.W. 2d 899.

Roy W. Champion filed suit for damages for personal injuries against Dow Chemical Company. He was represented by the Respondent law firm composed of Mr. Fox Benton and others. More than two years later, Dow took the necessary steps to secure Champion’s oral…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. WermskeTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Winston v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Postal Mutual Indemnity Co. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. McGeeTexas Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Gracey v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Knebel v. Capital National Bank in AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Honeycutt v. Billingsley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Law Offices of Windle Turley, P.C. v. GhiasinejadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API