Legal Opinion

Millsap v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 2005No. A05A1313PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Roy Manuel Millsap was tried by a jury and convicted of violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. On appeal, he claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, that the trial court erred by denying his motion for mistrial and that his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient, that the trial court did not err by denying Millsap’s motion for mistrial and that Millsap has failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel. Therefore, we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence showed that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Edmond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Carr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Dumas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Palencia-Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Peeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API