Dumas v. State

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Convicted by a jury of armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, possession of a firearm during commission of a felony, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, Quentin Dumas appeals the denial of his motion for new trial, alleging, among other errors, ineffective assistance of counsel and error in the court’s charge to the jury. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. Dumas’ motion for new trial was made on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, strongly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity,…