Edmond v. State

Sears, Justice.

Appellant Eugene Edmond appeals from his convictions for malice murder and burglary, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to link him to the killing, and that the trial court erred by (1) admitting evidence that indicated appellant possessed cocaine; (2) charging the jury on corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony; and (3) denying appellant’s motions for a venue change and sequestered voir dire. After careful consideration and review of the record, we find no error associated with appellant’s convictions, and we affirm.

The facts introduced at trial were sufficient…