Legal Opinion
Milk Drivers, Dairy & Ice Cream Employees, Laundry & Dry Cleaning Drivers, Clerical & Allied Workers, Local Union No. 387 v. Roberts Dairy
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided November 26, 2003No. 4:03-cv-40385PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
GRITZNER, District Judge.
This matter now comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Clerk’s No. 3). The Court finds a hearing is not necessary and considers the motion fully submitted. Attorneys for the Plaintiff are Paige Fiedler, Scott Soldon, and Yingtao Ho; attorneys for the Defendant are Sharon Malheiro and Stephen Darden. For the following reasons, the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Plaintiff, Milk Drivers, Dairy and Ice Cream Employees, Laundry and Dry Cleaning Drivers,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Horn v. Van HornDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- Vest v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
- Christus St. Vincent Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Dist. 1199NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018