Legal Opinion
Laoura Ivanovna TEDEEVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1996No. 95-70145PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Respondent’s request for publication is granted. The Memorandum Disposition filed May 28, 1996, is redesignated, with modifications, as an authored Opinion by Judge BEEZER.
OPINION
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We consider when notice of a deportation hearing must be given in person to an alien before the alien can be deported in absentia.
Laoura Tedeeva (“Petitioner”) was ordered deported in absentia when she failed to appear for a hearing. Petitioner contends that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) did not give her notice of the hearing “in person” or establish by “clear,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2042, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3456 Pao Yang Ying Yang Jimmy Yang Bao Yang Seyar Yang Phonesavanne Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by10 opinions
- Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- J. Sacramento Garcia Maria L. Gomez Gamino Noel C. Garciagomez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Carolina ARRIETA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Popa v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Estifanos Giday v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.