Legal Opinion
Carolina ARRIETA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1997No. 95-70852PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Per curiam
Carolina Arrieta, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), dismissing her appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. The IJ entered an order of deportation in absentia when Arrieta failed to appear at the scheduled deportation hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and we grant the petition for review.
Arrieta contends that she failed to appear for her deportation hearing because she never received notice of the deportation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ricardo Hernandez-Vivas v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Laoura Ivanovna TEDEEVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by77 opinions
- Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Geovanni Hernandez-Montiel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Regina Salta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Mejia-Hernandez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dennis Medina-Morales v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.