Legal Opinion
Estifanos Giday v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 6, 1997No. 95-1503PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Estifanos Giday petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceeding. Finding that Giday was given notice of his deportation hearing in accordance with the Immigration and Nationality Act, we deny the petition for review.
I
Section 242B of the Immigration and Nationality Act requires that prior to a deportation proceeding, the INS give written notice to a deportable alien specifying, among other things, the nature of the proceedings, the charges being brought, and the statute the alien allegedly violated. 8…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless v. Marion S. Barry, Jr., Mayor of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Bhima Nathubhai Patel v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Bing Feng Chen v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Porfirio Romero-Morales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Soadjede v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Cornel Viorel Scorteanu v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hamazaspyan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gurung v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Camaj v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.