Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Budd
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 14, 1956No. 278PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
These are actions brought by the Secretary of Labor under § 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 52 Stat. 1060, 63 Stat. 910, 29 U. S. C. § 201, to enjoin respondents from violating the minimum wage, § 6, and record-keeping provisions, § 11, of the Act. The employees concerned work in tobacco-bulking plants operated by respondents in Quincy, Florida, which has a population in excess of 2,500. Respondents claim these employees are exempt from the Act. The District Court ruled against the respondents. 114 F. Supp. 865. The Court of Appeals reversed. 221 F. 2d 406. We granted certiorari, 350 U.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Tobin, Secretary of Labor v. Traders Compress CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Jenkins v. Martin P. Durkin, Secretary of Labor (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.