Legal Opinion
United States v. Drumb
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1946No. 3146PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the United States on its own behalf and for the benefit of tlTe Choctaw and Chickasaw Tribes of Indians to quiet title in the Tribes to certain lands in the City of McAlester, Oklahoma, on the ground that such lands had reverted to those tribes when they were abandoned for railroad purposes.
The- land which is the subject of this controversy consists of two city blocks which at one- time had been set aside for railroad station, siding, and railroad yard purposes in the City of McAlester. It was a part of a large area of land originally ceded to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation v. The Town of Maysville, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a Corporation v. The Town of Francis, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Seminole Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a Corporation v. Peter C. Walter, Betty Walter Allen, Jean Walter Davisson, and Daisy E. WalterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Seminole Nation v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.