Remley v. DeWall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Contempts. Imprisonment. Before Judge Clark. Sumter-County. Chambers. August, 1870. Said Remley and DeWall were merchants and partners, under the firm name of Remley and Company.. On .the 7th of January, 1870, DeWall filed a bill in said Court against Remley, praying for the dissolution of said firm, for an account and settlement, for injunction, and that a Receiver be appointed to take charge of the assets of the firm.
Read the full summary
Contempts. Imprisonment. Before Judge Clark. Sumter-County. Chambers. August, 1870. Said Remley and DeWall were merchants and partners, under the firm name of Remley and Company.. On .the 7th of January, 1870, DeWall filed a bill in said Court against Remley, praying for the dissolution of said firm, for an account and settlement, for injunction, and that a Receiver be appointed to take charge of the assets of the firm. The Chancellor granted an order requiring Remley to show cause, on the third Monday of said month, why said injunction should not issue and why a Receiver should not be…
1Opinion of the Court
.LOCHRANE, C. J.
In January, 1870, Mr. DeWall filed his bill against Remley, for dissolution of partnership account, settlement, appointment of Receiver and injunction. The Judge granted a rule, calling on Remley to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, and the Receiver appointed, and, until the hearing, restrained the defendant, under the prayer of the bill, from selling, or otherwise disposing of the stock in trade, or assets, books, or other articles belonging to the copartnership.
At the hearing, the Judge, by agreement of counsel of both the complainant and defendant, passed…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Ryan v. KingsberySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Estes v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Crudup v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Beebe v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.