Legal Opinion
Jensen v. Quik International
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 2004No. 97704PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick
Plaintiff, Eric Jensen, sought to rescind a franchise agreement with Quik International (Quik) pursuant to section 26 of the Franchise Disclosure Act of 1987 (Act) (815 ILCS 705/5 (West 2002)) on the grounds that Quik was not registered as a franchise with the Illinois Attorney General’s office, as required by sections 5 and 10 of the Act. Quik sought to stay the litigation in the circuit court of Cook County and compel arbitration of Jensen’s claim pursuant to an arbitration clause in the franchise agreement. The appellate court held that because compliance with the registration requirement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jacob v. C & M VIDEO, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Barter Exchange, Inc. v. Barter Exchange, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Cusamano v. Norrell Health Care, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Jensen v. Quik InternationalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
3Cited by22 opinions
- Faulkenberg v. CB Tax Franchise Systems, LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Ragan v. AT & T CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Galasso v. KNS Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- LRN Holding, Inc. v. Windlake Capital Advisors, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.