Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Quik International

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 2003No. 1-03-2023PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tully

Plaintiff, Eric Jensen, filed a complaint against defendants, Quik International (Quik), Murray Mead and Jack Reynolds, seeking to rescind his franchise agreement with defendants on the grounds that the Quik failed to comply with provisions governing the registration and sale of franchises in the Franchise Disclosure Act of 1987 (Act), as amended (815 ILCS 705/5, 10 (West 2002)). Defendants moved to stay the litigation pending arbitration and filed an arbitration demand pursuant to an arbitration provision in the franchise agreement. Thereafter plaintiff filed a motion to stay the arbitration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacob v. C & M VIDEO, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Barter Exchange, Inc. v. Barter Exchange, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Kilianek v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Cusamano v. Norrell Health Care, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Jensen v. Quik InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Seymour v. HugDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API