State Highway Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action is one of mandamus, commenced by the state highway commission, to require the pipe-line company to adjust its pipe lines and other structures to highway needs.
The parties have collaborated in a most commendable manner in preparation of the motion for the alternative writ and the answer. Issues of fact have been eliminated, and the highway commission’s motion for judgment on the pleadings raises the legal question on which the parties differ. A summary of the pleadings sufficient to indicate the nature of the controversy follows.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Ray v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.