Legal Opinion
People v. Attebury
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 2001No. Docket 115225PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.
We granted the prosecutor’s application for leave to appeal to consider the propriety of the trial court’s application of the “public safety” exception to Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436; 86 S Ct 1602; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966). Because we conclude that the circumstances of this case fall within the rule of New York v Quarles, 467 US 649; 104 S Ct 2626; 81 L Ed 2d 550 (1984), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 19, 1996, defendant approached his estranged wife in a shopping center parking lot in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. HellstromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.