Legal Opinion
Bank of California v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1940No. 27880PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 103 P.2d 27. Plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of recovering a sum of money due upon a promissory note signed by the Columbia Agricultural Credit Corporation as maker, and for recovery of damages from defendants because of their conversion of fruit covered by mortgages in favor of the Columbia Agricultural Credit Corporation which had been assigned to plaintiff as security for the payment of the note.
The pertinent portions of the complaint are:
"II
"That the defendants American Fruit Growers, Inc., a corporation, Columbia Agricultural Credit Corporation, a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Yakima Fruit Growers Ass'n v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Nelson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Capital National Bank v. JohnsWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Wenatchee Production Credit Ass'n v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adams v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Robbins v. Wilson Creek State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. Kitsap County Sewer District No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- Bank of California v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1941