Legal Opinion

H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 28, 1954No. C. D. 1637PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

A device known as an “Aladdin Rail Lubricator” was, upon importation, classified by the collector of customs as an article of metal, not specially provided for, pursuant to the terms of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802), and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiffs claim by their protest that the article should have been classified within the provision for “Machines, finished or unfinished, not specially provided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Van Bourgondien Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API