Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1938No. 26834. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendants denied liability and affirmatively pleaded contributory negligence. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, and this motion was granted, on the ground that there had been error in the instructions, and that the verdict was not in accordance with the evidence. From the order granting the new trial, the defendants appealed.

The accident which gave rise to the action happened August 17, 1936, at about twelve o’clock noon, at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Martin v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Brandt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Sanderson v. Hartford Eastern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. West Coast Transport Co. v. LandinWashington Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bartholomew v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lee v. MolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Veek v. Tacoma Suburban Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Combes v. SnowWashington Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API