Legal Opinion

Veek v. Tacoma Suburban Lines, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1956No. 33624PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This suit was instituted by Harriet E. Veek, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband; Laurence M. Veek, to recover damages for his alleged wrongful death. He died as the result of a collision between a United States government fire truck, in which he was riding, and a bus owned by defendant corporation.

At the time of his death, Mr. Veek was a civil service employee of the United States government, working as a member of the Fort Lewis, Washington, fire department. On June 6, 1954, at about ten-fifty p. m., a fire alarm was received at the Fort Lewis fire station. Mr. Veek was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lucas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Duff v. Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Dowler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McKay v. HargisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nadeau v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Bell v. Joint School District No. 241Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Siburg v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America Ex Rel. Estate of Lyda v. OdomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API