Legal Opinion

Thornton v. the Livingston Roe

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 31, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, District Judge.

Libelant William M. Thornton claims salvage by reason of certain operations conducted under his supervision and with his personal participation, as a result of which the S S Livingston Roe was saved from destruction by fire in the Port of Recife, Brazil, on May 2, 1943.

At that time Recife was one of the several foreign ports which the United States Armed Forces used to maintain avenues of communication and supply between the Americas and the European Theatre of Operations. It was the headquarters and center of operations of the United States Fourth Fleet, which was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. Libellants & of the Schooner AmistadSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. Hamburg-American Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  4. Oteri v. New OrleansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1885
  5. Firemen's Charitable Ass'n v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Oil Company v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Nolan v. A. H. Basse Rederi Aktieselskab & Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. United States v. American Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API