United States v. General American Transportation Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COOLAHAN, District Judge:
Defendant is the corporate owner and operator of a tank storage, farm, front ing on the Arthur Kill Waterway at Carteret, New Jersey. The Government has brought an Information against defendant alleging in eight counts violations of the Federal Refuse Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 407. 1 Defendant is charged with allowing, between September 24, 1970 and December 6, 1971, various chemical and petroleum products to enter the waterway from defendant’s facility. Under Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, defendant moves to dismiss seven…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Apex Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Hougland Barge Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. MacKin Construction CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975