Legal Opinion
Southern International Sales Co. v. Potter & Brumfield Division of AMF Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1976No. 72 Civ. 3989PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This motion for summary judgment requires the court to pass upon the binding effect of a stipulation of the parties as to the law governing the interpretation of their contract.
Defendant Potter & Brumfield is an Indiana-based manufacturer of electrical products. Plaintiff Southern International is a Puerto Rican corporation. By agreement dated April 2, 1969, plaintiff became defendant’s exclusive sales representative for Puerto Rico and adjacent United States islands. The agreement provided, among other things, that either party could terminate it “for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Haag v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Leslie Emery v. Merrimack Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Barnes Group, Inc. v. C & C Products, Inc., and Roy E. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Cornfeld v. Investors Overseas Services, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.