Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 13, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 to -35 (No-Fault Law), contains what is commonly known as an anti-stacking provision, N.J.S.A 39:6A-4.2 (section 4.2). That statute prohibits recovery of personal-injury-protection (PIP) benefits under more than one automobile-insurance policy for injuries sustained in any one accident. The question posed by this appeal is whether that statutory prohibition against “stacking” is limited to basic PIP benefits or whether it forecloses as well recovery of extended medical-expense benefits under two policies when the “stacking”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ingersoll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. William Roseman and Lori Lewin (073674)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. Warnig v. Atlantic County Special ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Knight v. AAA Midatlantic InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. RAYMOND NESBY VS. SHERYL FLEURMOND (L-1923-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API