Rivenbark v. Atlantic States Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that summary judgment was improperly granted for the reason that a genuine issue for trial was shown at the hearing. We do not agree with this contention.
Atlantic States’ motion for summary judgment was supported by the pleadings, depositions of the plaintiff, and Black-mon, the subcontractor-employer of plaintiff, plaintiff’s interrogatories to Atlantic States and its answers, a certified copy of the order of the industrial commission award for plaintiff’s claim against Blackmon, the subcontracts between Blackmon and Atlantic States and an affidavit of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mack v. . Marshall Field Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Jarrell v. Samsonite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Woodson v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Britt v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Bramlett v. Overnite TransportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Maraman v. Cooper Steel FabricatorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.