Legal Opinion

Maurin v. Carnes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1898No. Nos. 10,878-(259)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Morrison county, Searle, J., denying their motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

2

On November 10, 1890, one Kobe purchased the land in question from one Norris, and, in consideration of the conveyance, executed to Norris notes and a purchase-money mortgage for the sum of $4,000. The mortgage was duly recorded. Thereafter, on January 28, 1893, Kobe executed his warranty deed, by the terms of which he conveyed the land to plaintiffs; and, from the covenants of warranty contained in the deed, the mortgage to Norris was excepted. Thereafter there was default in the payment of two of said notes (the others being not yet due). The mortgage was duly foreclosed under the power of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rockwood v. DavenportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. ButtsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Maurin v. CarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Brady v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Netherton v. HoltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Scheibel v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API