Brady v. Gilman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, entered purusant to the findings and order of Holt, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action of ejectment. Trial by the court without a jury. The district court of the county of Hennepin, in which the action was pending, as a conclusion of law based upon its findings of fact, directed judgment on the merits for the defendant. It was so entered, and the plaintiff appealed from the judgment.
The question for our decision is whether the conclusion of law and judgment are supported by the findings of fact. The short facts found by the court are these: On October 7, 1903, the premises in question were duly sold on the foreclosure by advertisement of a mortgage, which was the first…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hughes v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Maurin v. CarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hopkins v. StemmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Williams v. EttensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- C & M Real Estate Services, Inc. v. ThondikulamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.