Legal Opinion

Varuzza v. Bulk Materials, Inc.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 7, 1996No. 96-CV-80 (LEK) (DRH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs, Canadian citizens, commenced this action against defendants alleging inju*256ries suffered in a motor vehicle accident on August 22, 1995 in this district. Approximately one week after the accident, plaintiff Frank Varuzza provided a written statement (the statement) to an investigator from his Canadian insurance company. Defendants demanded production of that statement and plaintiffs objected. Defendants have now moved for an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a) compelling production of the statement. For the reasons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Betty U. Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Diamond State Insurance v. Rebel Oil Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
  2. Cutchin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Calabro v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. Mitchell v. CIT Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
  5. Steven Reyes Juarez v. NYCL Acquisition LLC, New York Cruise Lines, Inc., and New York Water Taxi, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API