Legal Opinion
Bates v. Daisy Education Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 26, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02647Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Barthinia Bates, No. CV-24-02647-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Daisy Education Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Barthinia Bates filed a complaint that refers to Title VII, a state criminal 16 statute, and a state regulation. Defendants Daisy Education Corporation, Sonoran Science 17 Academy, Faith Karatas, and Monroe Walker II believe the complaint states a claim or 18 claims under Title VII, but they argue Bates has no viable claim under the criminal statute 19 or state regulation.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Joseph L. Pena v. Booth Gardner Lawrence Kincheloe Warden John Lambert Amos ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Craig v. M & O AGENCIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.