Legal Opinion
Nelson-Johnston & Doudna v. Metropolitan Utilities District
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1940No. 30703PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the district court for Douglas county sustaining defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition filed to secure an injunction against alleged unlawful trading on the part of the Metropolitan Utilities District of the city of Omaha. The plaintiff refused to plead further and plaintiff’s petition was thereupon dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff is a corporation with its principal place of business within the territory served by the Metropolitan Utilities District, a taxpayer of the city of Omaha and a patron and user of the gas and water…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Keen v. Mayor of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Andrews v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Milligan v. City of Miles CityMontana Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Metropolitan Utilities District v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Lincoln Electric System v. Nebraska Public Service CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- City of New Bedford v. New Bedford, Woods Hole & Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.