Riedt v. Winters Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This action was instituted by the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover as damages the difference between the price for which a new Taylor Freezer and a new Kelvinator were sold and the price, for which they were resold after defendants had refused to accept and pay for said property.
The plaintiff pleaded a written contract of sale, a tendered delivery of the property involved and a refusal by the defendants to accept or pay for the property and a resale thereof for $535 less than the price…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guthrie Mill & Elevator Co. v. Thompson & GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Riddle v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hart Grocery Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. HenningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Protzman v. RockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Detrixhe v. McQuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Kunkel Plumbing and Heating Company v. EstesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Barnett v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957