Myrick v. Nexsen Pruet Jacobs Pollard & Robinson, LLP
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurrence
Justice BEATTY:
I concur in the opinion on the merits; however I disagree with the inference that $10,000.00 is an appropriate measure of damages for a sanction for contempt of court in this case. Initially, I am reminded that an appropriate sanction for contempt of court is within the trial court’s discretion. Secondly, I am reminded that the parties agree that the $10,000.00 liquidated damages provision only applied to the covenant of confidentiality and that there was no breach of confidentiality. Finally, an award of damages would reward Appellants for obvious disingenuous discovery…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rhoad v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Sumner v. BankheadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922