Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Myrick v. Nexsen Pruet Jacobs Pollard & Robinson, LLP

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2008No. 26547Published

1Concurrence

Justice BEATTY:

I concur in the opinion on the merits; however I disagree with the inference that $10,000.00 is an appropriate measure of damages for a sanction for contempt of court in this case. Initially, I am reminded that an appropriate sanction for contempt of court is within the trial court’s discretion. Secondly, I am reminded that the parties agree that the $10,000.00 liquidated damages provision only applied to the covenant of confidentiality and that there was no breach of confidentiality. Finally, an award of damages would reward Appellants for obvious disingenuous discovery…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhoad v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Sumner v. BankheadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API