Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Bankhead

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 18, 1922No. 10869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action for specific performance, based upon the following contract:

“Sales Contract of Real Estate
“Ross E. Roach, Broker
“Rock Hill, S. C., Aug. 23, 1920.
“$19,425, or $105 per acr'e.
“Articles of agreement between Ross F. Roach for R. E. Sumner of Rock Hill, S. C., and J. W. Bankhead of Eowryville, S. C.:
“Ross F. Roach agrees to sell and J. W. Bankhead agrees to buy the following described property: One 185 acre (more or less, known as the John Roddey Lock view, about 2% miles> east of Rock Hill, four tenant houses, one barn,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmid v. WhittenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Welling v. CroslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Scarborough v. RegisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. Myrick v. Nexsen Pruet Jacobs Pollard & Robinson, LLPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. White v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API