Legal Opinion
Sumner v. Bankhead
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 18, 1922No. 10869PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
This is an action for specific performance, based upon the following contract:
“Sales Contract of Real Estate
“Ross E. Roach, Broker
“Rock Hill, S. C., Aug. 23, 1920.
“$19,425, or $105 per acr'e.
“Articles of agreement between Ross F. Roach for R. E. Sumner of Rock Hill, S. C., and J. W. Bankhead of Eowryville, S. C.:
“Ross F. Roach agrees to sell and J. W. Bankhead agrees to buy the following described property: One 185 acre (more or less, known as the John Roddey Lock view, about 2% miles> east of Rock Hill, four tenant houses, one barn,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schmid v. WhittenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Welling v. CroslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Scarborough v. RegisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Myrick v. Nexsen Pruet Jacobs Pollard & Robinson, LLPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- White v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924