Legal Opinion
Armstead v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 9, 2002No. SC01-1094PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
817 So.2d 841 (2002)
Brenda ARMSTEAD, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC01-1094.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 9, 2002.
Brenda Armstead, pro se, Galveston, TX, Petitioner.
No Appearance for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Brenda Armstead petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the instant petition and sanction Armstead for her abuse of the judicial system.
Armstead has filed a compilation of various letters and other documents that we treat collectively as a petition for writ of habeas corpus.…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rivera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Jackson v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Pettway v. McNeilSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Steele v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Sibley v. FLORIDA JUD. QUALIFICATIONS COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Tate v. McNeilSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- May v. BarthetSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.