Legal Opinion

Tate v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 13, 2008No. SC07-689PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

983 So.2d 502 (2008)

James L. TATE, Jr., Petitioner,

v.

Walter A. McNEIL, etc., Respondent.

No. SC07-689.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 13, 2008.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 2008.

James L. Tate, Jr., pro se, Bowling Green, FL, for Petitioner.

2Per curiam

James L. Tate, Jr., an inmate in state custody, filed a pro se "Petition for Writ of Mandamus," which has been treated as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.[1] For years, Tate has been futilely seeking vacation of his conviction and sentence in case 93-580CFA in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Martin County, Florida. Tate's instant petition also…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pettway v. McNeilSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Steele v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Johnson v. RundleSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. James v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  5. McCutcheon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API