Legal Opinion
American Transit Insurance v. Continental Casualty Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the plaintiff is the excess insurance carrier in an action entitled Newell v Mead Truck Renting, in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, Index No. 16226/88, the defendants Continental Casualty Insurance Company, David J. Clare, and Diamond Truck Leasing Co. appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 15, 1993, which, after a nonjury trial, declared the plaintiff to be the excess insurance carrier and Continental Casualty Insurance Company to be the primary insurance carrier in the underlying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Federal Insurance v. Atlantic National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Davis v. De FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Davis v. De FrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- NL Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Osorio v. Kenart Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- AIG Premier Insurance v. RLI InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Macari v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.