Legal Opinion
Macari v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an underlying action entitled Odeh v Macari, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 12366/98, the defendant appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated March 7, 2001, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and made the declaration.
Ordered that the order and judgment is modified by deleting the provisions thereof granting the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- MATTER OF FIREMEN'S FUND INS. CO. OF NEWARK v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wasserheit v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- American Transit Insurance v. Continental Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Hamilton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INS. v. Employers Ins. Co. of WausauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Western Heritage Insurance v. Century Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- 79th Realty Co. v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Employers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.