Legal Opinion
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 3, 2003No. 98 C 3952PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge.
I conducted a bench trial in this patent infringement case between February 5 and 21 of this year, by designation of the chief circuit judge' pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 291(b), and this opinion comprises the findings of fact and conclusions of law that Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) requires me to issue. The plaintiffs in their post-trial brief erroneously refer to “findings” that I made in the course of the trial. I made no findings during the trial; these are my findings. The Procedural Setting and Pretrial Rulings
The plaintiffs are two subsidiaries of Glaxo, the…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re TaborUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. Pentech PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.