Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 2, 2000No. 82,071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a sentencing guidelines case. At issue is whether Nicolas E. Perez qualifies for sentence conversion under K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 22-3717(1) and, if not, whether K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 22-3717(1) is unconstitutional. The district court held Perez was not eligible for sentence conversion. Perez maintains that the district court’s refusal to convert his sentence under K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 22-3717(f) denies him equal protection under the law. We disagree.

We have jurisdiction because the underlying sentence is an indefinite life sentence. See K.S.A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chiles v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. State v. SiskSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Battrick v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Peterson v. Garvey Elevators, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Payton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Mueller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. Nelson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MuellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. Four B Corp. v. Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API