Legal Opinion
Four B Corp. v. Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 26, 2003No. CIV.A.01-2394-CMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
This purported class action arises out of an alleged international conspiracy to fix the prices of sorbates, including potassium sórbate and sorbic acid, which are chemical preservatives used in food products. Plaintiffs are “indirect purchasers” of sor-bates, who allegedly purchased products containing sorbates that were manufactured and sold by defendants. Plaintiffs allege that defendants engaged in the manufacture and sale of sorbates throughout the world and specifically in Kansas. Plaintiffs further allege that defendants’ conspiracy to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Redhair v. Kinerk, Beal, Schmidt, Dyer & Sethi, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- EuroTec Vertical Flight Solutions LLC v. Safran Helicopter EnginesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- In Re Intel Corp. Microprocesor Antitrust Lit.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.