Legal Opinion

Stokeling v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 2019No. 17–5554PublishedCited by 317 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

This case requires us to decide whether a robbery offense that has as an element the use of force sufficient to overcome a victim's resistance necessitates the use of "physical force" within the meaning of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(2)(B)(i). We conclude that it does.

*549 I

In the early hours of July 27, 2015, two people burgled the Tongue & Cheek restaurant in Miami Beach, Florida. Petitioner Denard Stokeling was an employee of the restaurant, and the Miami Beach Police identified him as a suspect based on surveillance video from the burglary and witness statements.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by317 opinions

  1. Shular v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Quarles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Justin TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. Banegas Gomez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

312 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API