United States v. Ross
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Chief Judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at Fort Hood, Texas, on March 1, 1990. Pursuant to appellant’s pleas, he was found guilty of three specifications of conspiring to alter a public record, i.e., an “Army Service Vocational Aptitude Battery test,” in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 881. In addition, he was also found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of a single specification of wrongfully completing an “Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test” for another…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. KinmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. GlazierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. MullensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. HardisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. NourseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. ShupeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. LoweNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.