Legal Opinion
Alexander v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1989No. 3-88 CIV 808PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
This case involves a constitutional challenge, via 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to the November 7, 1986, amendment to section 540.410 of the zoning ordinance of the City of Minneapolis. 1 That amendment regulates the possible locations of various adults-only facilities within the City of Minneapolis. Basically, the ordinance provides that adults-only bookstores, motion picture theaters, and entertainment centers may locate only within the B4 Central Business District. 2 Additionally, these facilities, as well as massage…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alexander v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- ILQ Investments, Inc. v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Orrell v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Brookpark News Books, Inc. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cline v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.