Legal Opinion
ILQ Investments, Inc. v. City of Rochester
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 22, 1993No. Civ. 3-92-751PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs brought this action against defendant alleging violations of their rights under the first, fourth, and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota. 1 They seek declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3), 2201, 2202 and 1367(a). Now before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
Background
A. The Parties
Plaintiff ILQ Investments, Inc. owns real property located at 220 SW 1st…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bloom v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Bukaka, Inc. v. County of BentonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Sports Design and Development, Inc. v. SchoneboomDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Z.J. Gifts D-2, L.L.C. v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Perkins v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997