Legal Opinion

Spence v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 6, 1950No. 26667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREED, District Judge.

The petition of defendant for rehearing seeks “a clarification of the policy of the Court with respect to cases of this character brought against it in the Northern District of Ohio.” Let it be clearly understood that the Court is not by the present ruling, providing parties in litigation with a slide rule to enable them to calculate with mathematical precision the result that will be reached on motions to transfer that may be filed in other cases. All cases will be heard and decided on their particular facts. The very phraseology of the statute under which this motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Naughton v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127 v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Nagle v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mohamed v. Mazda Motor Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
  2. Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Geiger v. KeilaniDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967
  4. Insurance Company of North America v. Ozean/stinnes-Linien and the M/v WurttembergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Wall v. American Employers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API