Marquard v. Pacific Columbia Mills
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGregory, Justice
I agree with the majority opinion as to all issues except its holding that the Industrial Commission did not err in refusing to submit the case to a medical board pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 42-11-120 (1976). I think submission to a medical board is mandated by statute in this case and dissent as to that issue.
Section 1-23-380(g) of the Code (Cum. Supp. 1981) provides the scope of review of administrative agency decisions. The Industrial Commission is an agency within the meaning of § 1-23-380. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc., 276 S. C. 130, 276 S. E. (2d) 304 (1981).
The Circuit Court and this Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Sturkie v. Ballenger Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Mitchem v. FISKE-CARTER CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982