Legal Opinion

Sturkie v. Ballenger Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1977No. 20430PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an appeal pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Section 72-1, et seq., of the 1962 Code. The Single Commissioner, Full Commission, and Circuit Court resolved all issues in favor of the claimant-respondent Sturkie. We affirm.

Claimant, while working in Puerto Rico, suffered an alleged injury involving his heart and respiratory system which later developed into emphysema. The ultimate issue is whether the claimant sustained an “injury by accident” resulting from exposure to altitude, climate, and working conditions.

The compensability of a particular event as an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. J. Norman Geipe, Inc. v. CollettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Goethe v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Hiers v. BRUNSON CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Layton v. Hammond-Brown-Jennings Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Jordan v. Dixie Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Mullinax v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Brown v. R. L. Jordan Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Pee v. AVM, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API