Quaker Oats Co. v. Cedar Rapids Human Rights Commission
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LeGRAND, Justice.
The question here is whether a short-term disability income plan in effect for all employees of Quaker Oats Co. (hereafter Quaker) illegally discriminates on the basis of sex by excluding “disabilities due to pregnancy or disorders resulting therefrom.” The Cedar Rapids Human Rights Commission (hereafter Commission) appeals from a decree holding it does not. We reverse and remand for further proceedings as noted herein.
This case arose upon a complaint filed by Sandra K. Tennyson (hereafter claimant), a laboratory technician employed by Quaker, who submitted to an abortion…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nashville Gas Co. v. SattySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. FluhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Lynch v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Karen McQuistion v. City of Clinton, Iowa Mark Regenwether Jeffrey Farwell And Jeffrey HorneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Iowa Bankers Ass'n v. Iowa Credit Union DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.