Harinek v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman
Gail Harinek (plaintiff) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her second amended complaint, which states claims of negligence (count II) and wilful and wanton conduct (count III) against the City of Chicago (defendant or the City) for acts that occurred during a fire drill conducted by the City’s fire department (the Department). The trial court’s order of dismissal, entered pursuant to section 2—619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2—619 (West 1992)), held that the City was immune from liability under the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (the Act)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Ziarko v. Soo Line RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Van Meter v. Darien Park Dist.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Stratman v. BrentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Dever v. SimmonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.