Allen v. Hunter
United States Circuit Court
[At law. Action by John Allen against TVilliam M. Hunter for damages for infringement of letters patent No. 8,621, granted to J Allen, December 23, 1851. Tried by jury. Verdict for defendant.]
1Opinion of the Court
Instruction of the Court.
This, gentlemen of the jury, is an action for the infringement of a patent. The plaintiff, who is the patentee, “claims to have invented a new and useful mode of sotting mineral teeth on metallic plates,” and he describes as follows the composition and mode of application: “The cement may be formed of any of the known fluxes, combined with silex, wedgewood and asbestos intermixed with gold and platinum scraps, which form a metallic union with the plate upon which the teeth are set. The compound which I prefer is composed of silex 2 oz., white or fluid glass 2 oz.,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Rush v. MegeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- In re TenneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of William L. Tenney, Paul A. Frank and Scoville E. KnoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.